Firefox ie plugin upgrade#
Firefox ie plugin download#
Firefox ie plugin windows#

Contribute to DuckDuckGo's Open-Source Community.

Ads by Microsoft on DuckDuckGo Private Search.

But the benefits of a strong community are worth the risk it's enough to make the choice between IE7 and Firefox a meaningful one. It'll be interesting to see if the Firefox community can avoid this pitfall as Firefox gains in popularity.

Firefox ie plugin windows#

The big difference is that Firefox has a community of web developers and hobbyists who build cool applications for it while most of the folks extending Internet Explorer in the Windows world are writing spyware and other kinds of malware. The proof is in the fact that the average piece of Windows spyware actually consists of most of the core functionality of Greasemonkey. I completely disagree with this notion, and not only because Internet Explorer has Greasemonkey clones like Trixie and Turnabout. Dare Obasanjo asks, what happens when your community turns on you?Ī number of times while he was speaking, Tim O'Reilly gave the impression that extensions like Greasemonkey are examples of Firefox's superiority as a browser platform. It's clear that community support can make or break a product.

Firefox ie plugin download#

Microsoft's add-on site, meanwhile, isn't even completely run by Microsoft itself it's a co-branded download library powered by CNET's. The Firefox extension site, for example, is run by the Mozilla Foundation, which plays an integral role in the open-source movement. Microsoft doesn't seem to be doing anything to foster an add-on movement, either. So you don't have people with the same fervor devoted to writing IE add-ons as you have writing Firefox extensions. There is a sizable community of people that believes in open-source as a movement and philosophy, but outside the confines of Microsoft, you won't find a similar community devoted to Microsoft. But there's no timetable for this.īeyond that is a cultural issue. Microsoft is aware of the problem and says that it hopes to ultimately make it possible to author add-ons via scripting. To write an extension for Firefox, you only need to be able to write a script - and there are far more people in the world capable of writing scripts than are capable of writing C code. To write an add-on for Internet Explorer, you need to be a C programmer. A big one has to do with how add-ons are written. Firefox has an incredibly rich community of developers creating extensions, and IE has nothing that comes remotely close to it.ĭon't expect much to happen in the way of add-ons for IE7, at least for the foreseeable future. And Microsoft hasn't done much to cultivate community around Internet Explorer 7:Īnother area where IE7 has serious shortcomings is with add-ons that give extra features to the browser. Which makes me wonder: is the community around a product more important than the product itself?Ĭommunity doesn't happen accidentally. But Firefox has a stronger, more vibrant user community, and that ultimately makes it a better product than IE7. It's not that Firefox is inherently a better product than IE7. The lack of a viable FlashBlock for IE7 is enough to make me switch. But there are dozens of killer add-ins for Firefox that extend the browser in useful ways. I don't see a big difference between the two. I've used IE7 at work and Firefox at home for the last six months or so. I visit websites, which I consider more important than what I use to view said websites. I have no idea why anyone cares that much about their browser, or why they feel it needs to be some sort of contest. This comment in a web forum recently summed up my feelings nicely:

Firefox ie plugin upgrade#

But should IE6 users upgrade to IE7, or should they choose an alternative? Security concerns alone compel an upgrade. It's clear that users should upgrade, because IE6 is so ancient. Now that Internet Explorer 7.0 is final, the browser wars can begin again in earnest.